Korea Business Review
Korea Business Review

Korea Business Review · Section

MANAGEMENT ARTICLE

Premium
Essential CEO Competencies for Successful AX Implementation — 88% Adoption Rate, Only 6% Achieving Results: Five Kinds of Leadership Driving the Divide

경영 아티클

Essential CEO Competencies for Successful AX Implementation — 88% Adoption Rate, Only 6% Achieving Results: Five Kinds of Leadership Driving the Divide

Adoption is a constant, results are a variable — While 88% of companies use AI according to a McKinsey survey, only about 6% are high-performing companies contributing 5% or more to company-wide profits.<br>Governance Ownership — Direct supervision of AI governance by the CEO emerged as the factor most strongly correlated with generative AI's contribution to profits and losses.<br>Redesign Sensibility — 55% of high-performing companies fundamentally redesigned workflows upon AI implementation. The rest hovered around 20%.<br>The Power of Environmental Design — According to Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry analysis, the 13.8 percentage point gap in AI utilization between large and small-to-medium enterprises narrowed to 4 percentage points when controlling for organizational environment.<br>Skeptical Judgment — In a Korn Ferry survey, the number one top-priority competency for hiring was not AI technology, but critical thinking (73%) to evaluate and reject AI outputs.

김민경 책임기자 · 08/12/2026

Read more →
More Stories

경영 아티클

People Don't Leave Companies, They Leave Managers: The True Cause of the Engagement Crisis

According to the Gallup 2026 report, global employee engagement has plummeted to 20%, meaning only one in five workers is emotionally invested in their work, marking the first time in Gallup's history that engagement has declined for two consecutive years. Low turnover should not provide false comfort, as 51% of employees are actively preparing to leave and 16% remain in a state of "active disengagement," slowly eroding the organization from within. This engagement slump carries a heavy financial toll, generating roughly $10 trillion in global productivity losses (about 9% of GDP), with the cost of replacing a single employee reaching 50% to 200% of their annual salary. The root cause lies with middle managers: manager engagement plunged from 31% in 2022 to 22% in 2025, erasing the "engagement premium" and causing entire teams to falter under struggling leadership. The solution is to invest heavily in managers; best-practice organizations that provide training, coaching, and well-being support achieved a manager engagement rate of 79% (roughly four times the global average), proving that this crisis is not a matter of fate, but the result of choices.

박소유 책임기자 · 06/15/2026

People Don't Leave Companies, They Leave Managers: The True Cause of the Engagement Crisis

경영 아티클

How Far Can a CEO Really Shape Organizational Culture?

According to Gallup's 2026 survey of 141,444 respondents, global employee engagement stands at 20%, its lowest level since 2020. Manager engagement has plummeted from 31% to 22%, turning managers into the weakest link in corporate culture. McKinsey's OHI research shows that healthy organizations achieve total shareholder returns (TSR) three times higher than unhealthy ones, with leaders who combine decisiveness and empowerment acting as key variables for organizational health. While 82% of CEOs prioritize culture, only those classified as 'culture accelerators'—who directly link culture to strategy—achieved a twofold revenue growth gap (9.1% vs. 4.4%). Because direct supervisors account for 70% of the variance in team engagement, a CEO's most powerful cultural investment is not slogans, but managerial capability and engagement. In 2026, when only 12% of CEOs report tangible benefits from AI investments, a receptive organizational culture has become the deciding factor in the success or failure of AI transformation—proving that culture is not the speeches a CEO makes, but the accumulation of their decisions.

김민경 책임기자 · 06/11/2026

How Far Can a CEO Really Shape Organizational Culture?

경영 아티클

What Makes Performance Management Different in Successful Global Companies—Why Adobe and Microsoft Abandoned Annual Reviews and the Truth About Performance Management Through Data

Annual evaluations can no longer drive people. Every year-end, countless organizations worldwide repeat the same routine where managers spend days filling out review forms, and employees sigh over scorecards that compress a year of performance onto a single page, which then serve as the basis for compensation and promotions. Do these familiar procedures actually drive people to work harder and lead organizations in a better direction? Many leaders hesitate before this question, as they merely operate existing systems without seriously considering whether they truly work.

KBR 편집부 · 06/10/2026

What Makes Performance Management Different in Successful Global Companies—Why Adobe and Microsoft Abandoned Annual Reviews and the Truth About Performance Management Through Data