Korea Business Review
Korea Business Review

management-article

When a Crisis Hits, What Kind of Leader Are You? "Who Is to Blame" vs. "What Went Wrong"—How the First Question Shapes an Organization's Fate

When a problem occurs, the first question a leader asks typically splits into "Who was responsible?" or "What happened?," through which members learn how the organization handles mistakes. Findings from the Gallup 2026 report showing manager engagement at 22%, the DDI 2025 survey indicating direct supervisor trust at 29%, and the taboo phrase "You take responsibility for this" ranking first in a September 2025 survey by Daejeon Metropolitan Corporation suggest that the costs of blame-driven leadership are rising. Amy Edmondson's 1996 hospital study and 1999 study of 51 teams, along with Google's Project Aristotle, consistently confirm that teams with high psychological safety report more mistakes and learn more. W. Edwards Deming's 94-to-6 estimate and NASA's ASRS non-punitive reporting system show that shifting the focus of improvement from individual blame to system design, and repositioning accountability, allows risk signals to accumulate. A leader who looks at "what" is not one who avoids accountability, but one who, after analyzing causes and distinguishing between systemic and individual factors, assigns responsibility to individuals only in proportion to their share.

강지혜 선임기자Published 2026년 9월 9일Updated 2026년 9월 9일
Share
When a Crisis Hits, What Kind of Leader Are You? "Who Is to Blame" vs. "What Went Wrong"—How the First Question Shapes an Organization's Fate

When a problem occurs, the first question a leader asks typically splits into "Who was responsible?" or "What happened?," through which members learn how the organization handles mistakes. Findings from the Gallup 2026 report showing manager engagement at 22%, the DDI 2025 survey indicating direct supervisor trust at 29%, and the taboo phrase "You take responsibility for this" ranking first in a September 2025 survey by Daejeon Metropolitan Corporation suggest that the costs of blame-driven leadership are rising. Amy Edmondson's 1996 hospital study and 1999 study of 51 teams, along with Google's Project Aristotle, consistently confirm that teams with high psychological safety report more mistakes and learn more. W. Edwards Deming's 94-to-6 estimate and NASA's ASRS non-punitive reporting system show that shifting the focus of improvement from individual blame to system design, and repositioning accountability, allows risk signals to accumulate. A leader who looks at "what" is not one who avoids accountability, but one who, after analyzing causes and distinguishing between systemic and individual factors, assigns responsibility to individuals only in proportion to their share.

94% of Problems Stem from Systems, Not People <p class=

KBR Access

KBR Article content is available to Premium members only

This content is available exclusively to Premium members. Premium comes as a 1-month pass (₩34,900, one-time payment, no auto-renewal) or a monthly subscription (₩29,900/month) — both available via Toss Payments. Premium unlocks core content including ESG, KBR Articles, and KBR Analysis.

This month's reading: 0 / 0 used

KBR NEWSLETTER

Sign up for free and get the KBR Newsletter!

Sign up and opt in to the newsletter to receive KBR's curated business and economic insights by email.

Sign Up Free

RELATED CONTENT

Related Content

KBR CORE PRODUCTS