ESG MARKET & CASES
The Illusion That "K-ETS Makes Us Fine": The Blind Spot Revealed by CBAM Article 9
In the first full-scale year of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the common belief that "having K-ETS means we are fine" is only half true. The real level of protection is determined not by possessing a system, but by the actual carbon price paid and the quality of verified data. As the EU CBAM entered its full operational phase on January 1, 2026, the long-held assumption inside Korean industry that the K-ETS would largely offset burdens at the EU border has necessitated a reassessment. According to European Commission guidance, CBAM operated as a transitional phase focused purely on reporting obligations from October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025, but transitioned to a cost system requiring importers to purchase and surrender certificates starting in 2026. The core issue is not whether South Korea operates an emissions trading system, but what carbon costs the EU actually recognizes under CBAM.
In the first full-scale year of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the common belief that "having K-ETS means we are fine" is only half true. The real level of protection is determined not by possessing a system, but by the actual carbon price paid and the quality of verified data. As the EU CBAM entered its full operational phase on January 1, 2026, the long-held assumption inside Korean industry that the K-ETS would largely offset burdens at the EU border has necessitated a reassessment. According to European Commission guidance, CBAM operated as a transitional phase focused purely on reporting obligations from October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025, but transitioned to a cost system requiring importers to purchase and surrender certificates starting in 2026. The core issue is not whether South Korea operates an emissions trading system, but what carbon costs the EU actually recognizes under CBAM.
In the first full-scale year of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the common belief that "having K-ETS means we are fine" is only half true. The real level of protection is determined not by possessing a system, but by the actual carbon price paid and the quality of verified data.…
KBR Access
ESG content is available to Premium members only
This content is available exclusively to Premium members. Premium comes as a 1-month pass (₩34,900, one-time payment, no auto-renewal) or a monthly subscription (₩29,900/month) — both available via Toss Payments. Premium unlocks core content including ESG, KBR Articles, and KBR Analysis.
FREE ACCOUNT · NO CARD REQUIRED
Create a free KBR account
Creating a KBR account is free and takes about a minute — no card required. You'll come straight back to this page once you're done.
KBR NEWSLETTER
Sign up for free and get the KBR Newsletter!
Sign up and opt in to the newsletter to receive KBR's curated business and economic insights by email.
LATEST IN TOPIC
Latest in this topic
Recycling 2 Million Mattresses Is Not the End: Raw Materials and Market Channels That Determine Circular Economy Profits
Better Water Use Efficiency Doesn't Eliminate Scarcity: Corporate Water Management Through the Lens of Microsoft
Patagonia's Circular Economy Blind Spot: Tasks Left After 170,000 RepairsRELATED CONTENT
Related Content
EU Food Waste Reduction Targets: Food Companies Must Change the Structures That Cause Waste, Not Just Measure What Is Thrown Away
PremiumApple's 30% Recycled Materials: What Supply Chains Must Prove Beyond 'Eco-Friendly' Raw Materials
PremiumWhy UNEP's Redrawn 'Exceeding 1.5°C' Pathway Demands Corporate Climate Strategies Combine Mitigation and Adaptation
